Those servers 317 at the core, not anything 503+. That's why.
|
|
The RS2 Section of Runescape Development is for sources running the 317-474 revision, so why is it full of threads with the title containing "Dungeoneering | Summoning | PK'ing Skill | 602 Anims & GFX ~ More! ~" or "Loads 525+ Maps" or something pertaining to content relased AFTER 474. There needs to be a strict ruling, i understand it is a rs2 based source but when you putting graphics, items, and other content that wasn't added until 503+ it needs to go in the RS 503+ Client and Server section, not the RS2.


I understand they are, but the content they show is not 317-474.
Completely agree, and that was part of my point in the main post. If they want the higher content - 525+ sidebars and graphics, just switch the higher revisons, don't flood the RS2 section with something that doesn't belong there.
Let's keep the language clean, it's just a discussion.

Those that you are talking about are 317 servers loading 500+ characters,items,animations,models..etc
Their contect can always be changed , you can remove them and turn back to 317.
But if you try to remove a 508 server characters and put 317 , its different.
I personally hate those 317 Loading 600+..piss me off.
I HATE NEW SHIT>.<

So let's say someone uses a 503+ protocol but changes the graphics for the client back to 474 or older. What would people think? Most the replies would be something along the lines of "Move" "Wrong Section" "Doesn't Belong Here". Same thing as what is happening in the RS2 Section. If you wanted 503+ Features, you would go to the 503+ Section - where that content should be. I understand the protocol is 317 but it just doesn't make much sense for people to try and copy graphics from a higher revision and put them with an older one.

I'm just saying, it's a discussion about a complaint, no reason to use "damn" or any sort of word that some people might not want to hear. I'm in the process of trying to stop using those kind of words because my fiance wants me to stop.
Back on topic.

| « Faulty System? | Chat spam and flaming » |
| Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |