If they don't then I reverse the moderators decision.
If this was the case they wouldn't and shouldn't be a moderator. Feel free to report them if you actually have proof of this.Most of the time they do but some of the time I feel their response is based on favouritism (whether they like the person or not) and if they don't like the person
Unnoticed by who? Administrators actively monitor appeals and reports.they can just ban their appeal and it will go unnoticed.
So every time somebody gets banned they are going to disagree with the moderator and ask for an admin to review it? If there was an issue with the punishment (i.e. a mod abusing) and you have proof of it then report the staff member. But don't just report them if you disagree, only report them if they are acting out of line.If a mod responds to an appeal or report a player thread, and the person who has been given the offence doesn't like the response of the Moderator, then the player can ask for a review on the original response, and the Administrator can decide whether the person's punishments get revoked or not.
No it isn'tThis is a great idea
Already are.because it means the Moderators are on watch
No they don't.Currently, certain Moderators feel that they can do what they want because they are ranked and can get off lightly, which is the wrong approach.
Again if you have proof of abuse then report them.Moderators should be able to help people and be nice to them. However some Moderators I feel abuse their power.
Won't happenI hope you can implement this into the forums.